![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Saturday, June 16, 2007 0:04 pm
To: Isaac Mendez (isaac.mendez@gmail.com)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: Note for Sylar
Yeah, so, UNIT files traced you to this email, which is, really, kind of cold and a bit cruel, considering the fact that you murdered the man whose name you're using.
We need to have a conversation about Nathan Petrelli.
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
Saturday, June 16, 2007 0:06 pm
To: Nathan Petrelli (xxxx@xxx.org)
CC: Katherine Pryde (katherine.anna.pryde@gmail.com)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: URGENT
Do not engage in anything with Sylar. Honestly, man, what are you thinking?
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
To: Isaac Mendez (isaac.mendez@gmail.com)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: Note for Sylar
Yeah, so, UNIT files traced you to this email, which is, really, kind of cold and a bit cruel, considering the fact that you murdered the man whose name you're using.
We need to have a conversation about Nathan Petrelli.
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
Saturday, June 16, 2007 0:06 pm
To: Nathan Petrelli (xxxx@xxx.org)
CC: Katherine Pryde (katherine.anna.pryde@gmail.com)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: URGENT
Do not engage in anything with Sylar. Honestly, man, what are you thinking?
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
From:
no subject
To: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
From: Isaac Mendez (isaac.mendez@gmail.com)
Subject: re: Note for Sylar
Yeah, I know. I kind of like it for that reason.
I didn't start things with Petrelli. He called me out. If you can't control your pet, then I will. I don't want to do this but I won't play these games with him. He thinks he's big and bad enough to take me on? Then let him try.
I'll make you a deal. I won't kill him. For you.
From:
no subject
To: Isaac Mendez (isaac.mendez@gmail.com)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: RE: re: Note for Sylar
You do realize that's just verging on sick?
You know, I'd rise to the bait about him being uncontrollable or big and bad, but the image of him as a pet is actually pretty funny. Mostly due to the irony in it because Nathan would never submit to that sort of thing. You get it, right? The irony of...right, well, I suppose you get it because you said it.
Really?
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
From:
no subject
To: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
From: Isaac Mendez (isaac.mendez@gmail.com)
Subject: re: RE: re: Note for Sylar
This is surprising? I have others. This is the one I use most for obvious reasons.
No, he wouldn't submit. Just like he's being a fool and backing down. How many warnings do I have to give him before he realizes how stupid this is? I have warned him.
Not that you have reason to believe me but I give my word. I won't kill him. If he insists, I'll stop him without lethal force. If you wish to be there, you can.
Call it me feeling a tiny bit of kindred spirit in you. Hate that as much as you like.
Sylar
From:
no subject
Sunday, June 17, 2007
From: Nathan Petrelli (NPetrelli@USCongress.gov)
To: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Re: Urgent
He engaged conversation. I
amwas having a badmonthmoment. One thing has led to another. I have my reasons. Iamwasirateangry.Thank you for your concern. I'm sure I'll come out on top of the whole
fight to the deathsituation. You're friendship is appreciated.Sincerely,
Nathan Petrelli
This email has been sent over an encrypted email server. It is intended for only those to whom it is sent. Violators are punishable by law. No Congressional funds were used in the sending of this email.
From:
no subject
To: Nathan Petrelli (NPetrelli@USCongress.gov)
From: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
Subject: RE: Re: URGENT
Don't do it, Nathan. Don't rise to his bait. You are smarter than this.
The Doctor
The content of this communication is classified as United Nations Intelligence Taskforce Confidential and Proprietary Information. As such, it is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and only others who are authorized to receive it. If you are not one of those, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by responding to this communication and then deleting it from your system.
From:
no subject
Sunday, June 17, 2007
To: Dr. John Smith (doc_who@unit.gov)
From: Nathan Petrelli (NPetrelli@USCongress.gov)
Re: Urgent
Intelligence and anger have never easily coincided with me. He knows exactly which buttons push me to anger.
And now that the challenge has been made by both parties (myself and him) I can't very well back down. I don't back down from anything.
What would you have me do?
Sincerely,
Nathan Petrelli
This email has been sent over an encrypted email server. It is intended for only those to whom it is sent. Violators are punishable by law. No Congressional funds were used in the sending of this email.